AMD EPYC 9004 series vs Intel 4th gen XEON
대체글=https://www.idc.com/promo/servers|가운데|섬네일|500x500픽셀
In brief : Well, this article is talking about the never-ending argument of AMD EPYC 9004 Genoa vs Intel 4th Gen Xeon CPU performance as of march 2023 to help someone who is considering extending or replacing server system. Global Server Revenues to Grow 17% YoY in 2022[1] and at least 13 million servers will be sold in 2023 and expecting a pretty aggressive upgrade cycle even if the growth rate for revenues in the server market will be smaller than in 2022. according to IDC.[2] So the battle field of AMD vs Intel would be farely interresting in this year 2023.
Key Market Drivers
There would be roughly 13 million servers will be sold in 2023 and expecting a pretty aggressive upgrade cycle even if the growth rate for revenues in the server market will be smaller than in 2022, according to IDC.[2] So, the second round of battle between AMD vs Intel in server CPU market should get into stride with their flagship model of CPU in 2023.
The core server market drivers are
- Supercomputing/Micro datacenter : Many enterprises are building their own supercomputing farm or scalable micro datacenter to develop software that can unleash Web 3.0 on consumers. From a government perspective, supercomputers are becoming ubiquitous in every research department within it – from being used only in defense initially to climate and healthcare now.
- Metaverse : The infrastructure spends to enable the Metaverse will give an impetus to servers as servers are the building blocks of the Metaverse. Major internet corporations and hyperscalers have already detailed their plans for spends on Metaverse infrastructure.
- Edge servers : Edge server configurations will be a key driver of growth in server shipments as companies start enabling chip-to-cloud features within the devices and 5G deployments make IoT use cases penetrate across all verticals – consumer, industrial, healthcare and banking.
- Cloudification of services : Many services are increasingly becoming cloud-based offerings as opposed to device-based earlier, with device storage and compute needs being taken care of by cloud-based services. Data centers, and thereby servers, are an integral part of the infrastructure needed to enable these services.
Benchmark Result - AMD EPYC 9004 series vs 4th gen Intel XEON
Openbenchmarking.org posted the public test results of the flagship server CPU model among AMD EPYC 9004 and Intel 4th gen XEON, Of the components selected for comparison, there were 155 benchmarks in common (matching test profile, test version and any configurable test options) and where that data was statistically significant and at least three independent data points for each component of the public test results on OpenBenchmarking.org. 가운데|섬네일|755x755픽셀|EPYC 9554 vs Xeon 8490H
The benchmark results shows 2 x AMD EPYC 9554 64-Core had the most wins, coming in first place for 87% of the tests. Based on the geometric mean of all complete results, the fastest (2 x AMD EPYC 9554 64-Core) was 1.306x the speed of the slowest (2 x Intel Xeon Platinum 8490H)[3].
The results with the greatest spread from best to worst included: Pennant (Test: sedovbig) at 2.968x, PJSIP (Method: OPTIONS, Stateless) at 2.441x, NAS Parallel Benchmarks (Test / Class: FT.C) at 2.198x, NAS Parallel Benchmarks (Test / Class: IS.D) at 2.129x, Xmrig (Variant: Monero - Hash Count: 1M) at 1.791x, ASKAP (Test: tConvolve MPI - Degridding) at 1.79x, NAS Parallel Benchmarks (Test / Class: LU.C) at 1.782x, Xmrig (Variant: Monero - Hash Count: 1M) at 1.779x, ASKAP (Test: tConvolve MPI - Gridding) at 1.714x, Embree (Binary: Pathtracer - Model: Crown) at 1.686x.
Here are few interresting results for your interrest, full benchmark test is available at 2 x AMD EPYC 9554 64-Core vs 2 x Intel Xeon Platinum 8490H
가운데|섬네일|690x690픽셀|mean of all test 가운데|섬네일|689x689픽셀 가운데|섬네일|687x687픽셀 가운데|섬네일|687x687픽셀
